director: James Cameron
starring: Sam Worthington, Zoë Saldana, Sigourney Weaver, Michelle Rodriguez, Stephen Lang, Giovanni Ribisi, Joel Moore
Director James Cameron’s long-awaited and heavily-hyped return to the big screen finally arrives in a dizzying tour-de-force of special effects and storytelling mastery. While the script doesn’t quite live up to the visuals, Avatar is a singular moviegoing experience – one that will serve as a milestone in film experience history. The film does indeed live up to the hype on a visual level. In fact, it succeeds on such a scale as to almost completely overwhelm the comparatively lightweight script and cliched characters, flaws that might stick in your mind after you’ve come down from the high of the in-theater experience.
On more than one occasion, I found myself comparing Avatar to Cameron’s 1986 masterpiece (as far as I’m concerned), Aliens. In fact, I tend to compare quite a few movies to Aliens each year (one example), likely because its original formula has been copied so many times since, with varying degrees of success. And while a story featuring a tribe of blue-skinned aliens trying to protect some sacred trees doesn’t quite echo “space marines fighting against a horde of terrifying, slimy aliens,” the key points are all worth comparing.
It’s all about the characters. Despite the stunning visuals bombarding you nonstop, it took a while for the film to really get going story-wise. This is due, in large part, to the rather one-note characters we’re riding along with. Our hero, Jake Sully, is given a brief back story before being whisked off to the distant moon of Pandora. We know he’s a rough around the edges Marine who lost use of his legs, and that’s about it. His character’s “development” throughout the film is essentially restricted to learning to yell loudly in the language of the natives while riding a flying dinosaur. He’s Avatar’s version of Aliens’ Corporal Hicks.
Cameron uses a few of the Aliens archetypes for some other characters as well, most notably with a no-BS latino female soldier (Aliens’ Vasquez), and a slimy, amoral bureaucrat willing to do anything in the name of profits (Aliens’ Burke). Michelle Rodriguez and Giovanni Ribisi don’t quite live up to their originals, I’m afraid, coming off as one-note performances fitting nicely into their cliched roles. Even Sigourney Weaver, who played one of the most memorable female characters in film history (Ellen Ripley), isn’t able to do much with the pedestrian dialogue she’s given. The parallels don’t end with the characters; there are other concepts and even whole sequences that echo the 1986 film. The robotic power walkers, the dropships, the cafeteria scene, and the cryo-sleep wake-up should all be familiar to anyone that’s seen Aliens.
But I suppose I’m digressing in a review that started by saying the film lives up its not inconsiderable hype which I referred to as a “milestone of film experience history.” I did give the flick an A, after all, and I stand by it – Avatar is incredibly entertaining, even if only on a visual level. Film is just such a medium, after all. The effects work is all outstanding and can certainly be considered among the best the medium’s ever seen. What truly takes it all to another level is the 3D effect the entire film is presented in. That may give some pause to those of you who’ve seen previous films with select 3-D sequences; sequences that often come off as a bit gimmicky. Fret not, Avatar’s 3-D isn’t of the “in your face” variety (as much as I can call a movie presented on a giant IMAX screen to be not “in your face”). It works well and while it’s not the giant leap forward I thought it’d be in 3-D technology, it succeeds admirably without ever becoming a distraction. If future filmmakers can couple the technology with some improved screen geometry and eyewear, the experience could easily jump another level. Despite that, much of Avatar is breathtaking.
I haven’t exactly gushed over the characters, and while about 85% of the movie is entirely digital, there is some real, honest-to-goodness acting occurring. The motion-capture technology is at its finest, and it never feels like you’re watching a digital puppet onscreen. This is perhaps Cameron’s greatest achievement – anyone in Hollywood these days can put together a visual landscape of mind-blowing environments and explosions; the true test comes in realizing a completely digital character onscreen to the point that you feel it’s actually a real, live being communicating its motivation via facial expressions and dialogue. Mission accomplished here — this isn’t Jar Jar Binks slipping on banana peels.
A $500 million plus budget and four years of production better overwhelm its audience in some way, as I’m sure 20th Century Fox is hoping for another Titanic or Dark Knight. Even with Cameron’s fairly stellar track record, it’s amazing for a studio to have outlaid such a sum in this day and age. They might’ve gotten lucky, ’cause Avatar lives up to its considerable hype and, though the script keeps it from being an all-time great, is a must-see in this or any year.
5 thoughts on “Avatar | A”
This may have earned A+ status after a second viewing. A third will have to decide for sure.
“We complain all the time about how the whole mainstream movie industry is designed to appeal to 14-year-old boys. For once, here was a movie that made me feel exactly like a 14-year-old boy, and I didn’t mind a bit.”
I’ve had a few days now to reflect on Avatar and I keep arriving at the same question.. “Had the move not been in IMAX 3D would I have thrown down my hard earned cash to see it at the theater?” Answer: NO
For me, without all the glitz and glam of the IMAX 3D experience this would have been another 3 star Netflix DVD rental. Grade C
Take out the 3D and I can’t figure out what exactly is suppose to be quite so visually stunning…hasn’t the likes of (*cough*) Lucas and the folks at Industrial Lights & Magic been doing this for the past 30 years?
Dark Knight is A+ material…….Avatar is just a interstellar incarnation of Dances with Wolves, The Last Samurai, the list goes on and on. Just as the story was unoriginal so is as you’ve already pointed out were the characters, a rehash of Cameron characters of movies past. I found myself rooting for Col Quaritch, I’m not sure what that means?
Have seen it twice now…once in IMAX three d, and once in standard/non three d….third and final, I think will end up being my favorite….non IMAX, but in three d.
I found the colors and the floating mountains stupendous…as well as the colored “birds”. Reminded me of Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, Star Trek, and Jurassic Park all rolled into one.
I wish the story had been stronger, there would have been so much more to like…but I agree, well worth the viewing…
I can’t compare it with Aliens, because, GULP…I haven’t been able to watch Aliens from start to finish without covering my eyes most of the time…ok, ok, I’ll have to give it a try. After finally seeing the Terminator franchise for the first time last year, I’ll have to say that Cameron is one talented guy….He’ll never be a JJ Abrams, but he sure can make a movie!
And, my vote for favorite characters… The Colonel bad guy (the performance, not the character), and Giovanni Ribisi (the actor not the part).
Epic ness •_• ^_^!